google-site-verification: googleb6011c61c3b4db80.html
top of page

DON'T TAX AWAY
AUSTRALIA'S ENERGY SECURITY

A 25% tax on gas exports might sound like a good way to raise revenue. But in reality, it could mean less gas, higher costs and more uncertainty.


900B60FF-0A77-4CE8-9B56-3FC784C9EC29.png
Chart.png

AUSTRALIA IS
HEADING TOWARDS 

A GAS SHORTFALL.

Here's the part most people aren't hearing.

Australia's energy market operator (AEMO) warns that gas supply is set to fall sharply in the years ahead.
 

  • Production in southern states could drop by half within five years.

  • Shortfalls are expected across both the east and west Coasts.

  • That's the equivalent of gas used in around 500,000 homes.*

 
​At the same time, demand isn't disappearing.

So the question is simple: Where will the gas come from?

 

*AEMO, Gas Statement of Opportunities.
 

To avoid shortages, Australia needs new gas projects.

But these projects don't happen overnight.

They require:

 

  • Billions of dollars in upfront investment.

  • Years of planning and construction.

  • Long-term confidence from global investors.

 
Since 2010, more than $400 billion has been invested in LNG projects in Australia.*

That investment only happens when the rules are stable and predictable. 
 

*Department of Industry, Science and Resources.

NEW SUPPLY
DEPENDS ON
OVERSEAS
INVESTMENT.

Butterflies.jpg

WHAT HAPPENS
WHEN THE

RULES CHANGE.

This is where the proposed tax comes in.

A sudden 25% export tax doesn't just reduce profits - it changes whether projects go ahead.

And when projects don't go ahead, supply doesn't grow.
 
We've seen this play out before.

In the UK, a windfall tax on energy companies led to: cancelled projects, failing investment and reduced exploration.

One major company cut its investment plans by around 70%.*


 

*UK Office for Budget Responsibility, company disclosures.

Some argue Australia should follow Norway's model, which has higher taxes.

But Norway's system works very differently.
 
There the government:
 

  • Owns large stakes in energy projects.

  • Shares the risk and costs.

  • Even refunds losses to companies in early stages.
     

Australia doesn't do that.

Here, projects are funded by private investment - and that investment depends on getting the settings right.

 

*Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Business Council of Australia

Norway.png

WHY COMPARISONS
WITH NORWAY

DON'T STACK UP.

Background
2nd biggest corporate taxpayer
$21.9 Bn in taxes & royalties paid last year alone
Equivalent to cost of funding the PBS

¹ATO Statistics
²Australian Energy Producers 2024-25 Financial Survey, June 2025

³Commonwealth Treasury, Budget 2025-26, Budget Paper 1, p.120

This debate isn't about tax, or whether Australia's gas industry pays its way - the Australian Tax Office data confirms the industry is already the nation's second biggest taxpayer.

This debate is about:

 

  • Keeping energy reliable.

  • Keeping prices under control.

  • Supporting jobs and regional communities.

  • Maintaining relationships with key partners like Japan and Korea.
     

Because once investment leaves, it doesn't come back quickly.

And once gas supply drops, the consequences are felt everywhere.​

 

bottom of page